Categories
Uncategorized

M1 Mac Malware — The Truth!

First malware running on M1. First Malware design for M1. First M1 Malware has arrived. First M1 malware discovered. M1 faces first malware. First. First. First in YouTube comments First!

But other than being first to scream first onto the internet, what does this really mean for M1, the Mac, and most importantly — us?

Only a small percentage of you watching are actually subscribed, so do me a solid and hit that button and bell, so we can build the biggest and best community in tech, together.

The internet has exploded with M1 Mac malware headlines this week, from the genuinely informative to the pathetically sensational. Like, from in depth-technical explainers to O.M.G I’m throwing my M1 in the trash fire now. D.E.D. DED.

And I’ll explain what it all actually means in a hot minute, but I get it, I totally get it, the first time anything new happens it’s… news by definition, and if it involves Apple, it’s big news. I mean, never mind if it bleeds-it-leads, if it’s Apple it’s clickable. And that’s actually really good for Apple customers — the more and higher the scrutiny Apple’s under, the better for us. I high key wish every company got the same amount of security so every customer would get the same benefits from that scrutiny. Currently, it’s just another advantage of buying from Apple.

At the same time, I also firmly believe that with great audience comes great responsibility. That if you have a platform you shouldn’t use it to scare or stress people but to educate and empower them. In other words, the headline will get you the click, it’s what you do after that that defines you.

So, let’s dig into exactly what’s happening here …

First, Malware means malicious software, in other words, any code designed to damage or compromise your computer. There are viruses and Trojan horses that want to get in and take over various levels of control, spyware that wants to steal your data, ransomware that wants to hold your data hostage, and adware that wants to jack money from your clicks.

Originally, malware was far more common on Windows than Mac because Windows was far more common than the Mac. And the people making the malware wanted to spend their time on the biggest, most valuable, then-most vulerable market possible. But, with the increasing power and importance of web browsers, the explosion of iOS, and the high value of mass-market Apple customers, it became more and more economical to target the Mac as well, even specifically.

Hence, the Mac malware we’ve seen creeping, coming up over the last few years. And with it, Apple’s escalating efforts to keep Mac users safe.

Because, where the iPhone and iOS were designed to be little crypto bricks from the start, the Mac originated as a relatively open computing system, and that required Apple’s security teams to think.. different.

Over the years, that’s included sandboxing, to prevent code from spreading from one app to another. Gatekeeper, to prevent unauthorized apps from running without our express permission, system integrity protection and read-only system volumes to prevent code from modifying the operating system, system extensions and DriverKit to keep modifications out of kernel space and move them into user land, a permission system so apps have to ask before they can access files. And XProtect, Notarization, an MRT, the malware removal tool, which try to prevent malware from getting onto the Mac to begin with, allow Apple to scan apps before they’re distributed and revoke certificates to stop them running if they later turn bad, and even remove or remediate known infections if they somehow still land.

While some of this… defense in depth… like Gatekeeper and permissions are wicked obvious because they popup and pop off so damn always, other things like XProtect and MRT work quietly in the background so you may not even know they’re there.

And, ultimately, malware is just code. If it runs on Intel, chances are it can run through Rosetta2 on the M1, or the developer can use the same tools any developer uses to port that code to Apple silicon. From x86 to ARM64.

A tool is… just a tool. Apple makes excellent, excellent tools. That why we have so many apps ported over to M1 already. Even big, sophisticated apps. But even the best tools can and will be used for bad things.

So, just like any other code, any other apps, someone used those excellent tools to port not a utility or game from Intel to M1, but malware.

Which is absolutely super frustrating, really an inconvenience, but not surprising or even unexpected. Not in the least. Not if you understand even the basics of how any of this works. Which everyone covering it really, really should.

Same goes for Silver Sparrow, the second bit of malware to get attention this week, discovered on both Intel and the M1 Macs. Because, again, code can be ported. That’s how code works.

And Apple can pull the certificate to stop it. That’s how the system works… how it’s working as intended.

But the other part of the story here, the part that isn’t getting as much attention, is that while the code may be ported, the environment it’s being ported to is very different.

M1 is the same silicon generation as A14 Bionic, the chipset in the iPhone 12. And that doesn’t just translate to very high levels of performance efficiency, it also translates into very high levels of hardened security.

Instead of Apple having to do a lot of more complex mitigations in software, the way they’ve had too with Intel chips in the past, now they can do them from the silicon-on-up as well. Just like they’ve been doing it on the iPhone and iPad for years.

That means, instead of flinging malware at a semi-detached wood cabin, they’re now flinging it at a not-so-little crypto brick. There will still be issues, there will still be holes, the will still be bugs and exploits, and Apple will still be judged on how fast their red teams respond to all of them every time. But the Mac in standard mode, the way the vast majority of mainstream customers will be using it, starts off on a much, much better security foundation. And that’s a huge benefit to everyone using M1.

Plus, Apple works continuously on new and improved systems as well, like what’s coming in iOS 14.5. Namely, Blastdoor, which will protect against things like unicode rendering bugs and malicious payloads in iMessage, and also new protections again zero-click attacks.

And on M1, all that gets the advantages of the silicon-based security engines as well.

Now, I’m trying to keep this relatively high-level, because my goal here is to make sure everyone is informed about the existence of malware targeted at all Macs, including M1, but not made to feel afraid simply, unremarkably, just because it exists, because attention jacking is really just another form of malware.

Categories
Uncategorized

iPhone 11 vs iPhone 12 in 2021 — Don’t Choose Wrong!

I’m going to tell you if the, iPhone 12, with a lighter, squared off retro future chic design, OLED display, MagSafe charging, and 5G is worth its starting price of $829. Or… if the year-older iPhone 11, all rounded and curved, classic LCD, and… that’s pretty much it, is a better value at $599.

Design

The iPhone 11 has the curved edges and sides of the previous many generations of iPhones, going all the way back to the iPhone 6. It looks almost generic at this point but wow does it still feel great. It also comes in the most colors. 6 of them. Purple, yellow, green, black, white, and red.

The iPhone 12 goes back to the future with squared off edges and sides, like the iPhone 4 and 5 of eld, but makes them look new again in a package that’s 15% smaller by volume and 16% lighter. It looks, to my eye, way cooler, though it can bite into your hand just a little bit more. Some find it annoying, others even better for grip. Only 5 colors though. Blue, green, red, white, and black.

So if you prefer the curves, don’t mind if it’s heavier, or want purple or yellow, go for the iPhone 11.

But, if you love the new look, see lighter as better, or want that new blue, go for the iPhone 12.

Display

The iPhone 11 has a 6.1-inch LCD display, what Apple calls Liquid Retina. And it’s honestly about the best LCD can be. It goes corner to curved corner, and while it’s not HDR, not high dynamic range, it’s still high density and wide color gamut, and it doesn’t do pulse-width modulation, which bothers some people about OLED.

The iPhone 12 has a 6.1-inch OLED display, what Apple calls Super Retina XDR for extreme dynamic range. Deep shadows and blacks, bright highlights and whites, high contrast and even higher density. It’s what you want to watch movies on, including the Dolby Vision movies you can shoot on the iPhone 12.

So, if you hate OLED and prefer LCD, or you just don’t care about display technology either way, you can save some cash and go iPhone 11.

If you want the best display you can get, especially if you watch a lot of streaming video or take a lot of HDR video, you’re going to want the iPhone 12.

Durability

The iPhone 11 has strong ion-exchange glass, which helps prevent shattering if you drop it, and water resistance up to 2 meters and 30 minutes.

The iPhone 12 has ceramic impregnated glass on front, what Apple calls Ceramic Shield, which amps up the shatter-protection even more, and water resistance up to 6 meters for 30 minutes.

So, if maximum durability is high on your list, you’re going to want the iPhone 12.

Performance

The iPhone 11 has an Apple A13 Bionic chipset, built on a 7 nanometer process with better performance efficiency than pretty much anything else on the market…

Except for the iPhone 12 and its Apple A14 Bionic chipset, built on a 5 nanometer process, which is basically the best silicon in the world right now.

So, if you’re not all about the speeds and feeds, you’ll be totally fine with the iPhone 11.

But if you want the latest and the greatest, and the ability to get iOS updates for as long as currently possible, you’ll want the iPhone 12.

Cameras

The iPhone 11 has a really good camera system with wide angle and ultra wide angle, with Smart HDR2, deep fusion, and Night Mode on that main wide angle sensor, and the ability to capture up to 4K60 video with enhanced dynamic range.

The iPhone 12 has an amazing camera system, with better wide angle and ultra wide angle, Smart HDR3, deep fusion, and Night Mode on all the sensors, and the ability to capture up to 4K60 EDR and 4K30 HDR in full-on Dolby Vision.

So, if good enough is good enough when it comes to the camera for you, then the iPhone 11 is probably more than enough.

But if your iPhone is your primary camera and you always want to take the absolute best photos and videos you can, you’ll want the iPhone 12.

Cellular

The iPhone 11 has an Intel 4G LTE radio that can get pretty good speeds in most places, most of the time. But some people complain about it not working as well in areas with poor signal and reception.

The iPhone 12 has a Qualcomm 5G NR radio that also does 4G LTE. 5G speeds and reliability vary incredibly by region, from slower low band to double speed mid band to unbelievably fast but fragile mmWave. But it can also give you better LTE.

So, if all you have is 4G and it’s always worked fine for you on previous iPhones, and you’re not expecting 5G any time soon, you’ll be just as fine on an iPhone 11.

If you’ve always had problems with 4G, or you have or expect to get 5G soon, and you want to take advantage of it, you’ll want to grab the iPhone 12.

Charging

The iPhone 11 has a Lightning port, which works with both older Lightning-to-USB-A cables and charges, and newer, faster Lightning-to-USB-C cables. It can also charge inductively up to 7.5w with a Qi-compatible inductive pad.

The iPhone 12 has a Lightning port, which functions in the exact same way, but also MagSafe charging, which next-levels the induction to 15 watts, provided you use a magnetic MagSafe compatible accessory.

Since batter life is pretty much the same on both… 5G permitting… the only major difference here is if you want MagSafe, you’ll want the iPhone 12.

Categories
Uncategorized

M1X & M2 Macs — WTF Leak Bombs?!

Special gross-out, shout-out to Intel for sending out the worst… the worst… M1 clickbait in the form of completely dishonest talking points where they literally bait and switch comparisons over and over again, up to and including putting the ultra-low-power M1 up against a white box Intel configuration that I’m pretty sure isn’t even available to the public. Not only is that the baddest of the bad looks, but in light of the performance differences per watt, it’s just an utter credibility destroyer. And for someone like me, who still uses an Intel Mac, and who wants to see Intel not only survive but thrive again, because that’s what’s best and most competitive for the market, please very kindly stop. It’s embarrassing. Like mom or dad on the lawn in their underwear screaming at clouds embarrassing. Just fix your drama, fix your process, and ship better chips already. Signed, a grateful industry.

Now, look, we’ve gotten used to all the phone leaks. Ever since an iPhone walked into a bar back in 2010, our internet feeds have runneth over with with every stock market manipulation, industry insider report, biz pub spoiler alert, and Twitter thirst trap imaginable.

But, with Apple shipping their own custom silicon for the Mac, we’re now being inundated with all kinds of cheap… chip leaks as well.

Because, back with Intel, there weren’t any real surprises. Not positive ones at least. Intel would announce their roadmap well in advance, like three or four lakes ahead, just all the lakes, we’d find out the process shrink and performance weren’t anywhere nearly what any of us hoped — including Intel — and then we’d judge-Judy-tapping-our-watch-dot-gif wait impatiently for the Mac-specific versions of those chips to ship, the ones with the right embedded graphics options or whatever. Usually months and months later, usually the same day the Mac shipped. Rinse and repeat for years.

In a very real way, Apple’s Mac roadmap was bound to Intel’s chip roadmap. Or rather dragged by it. And now, in the age of M1, it isn’t. Not any more. Not at all.

But, we’re only at the very early stages for the Mac. We’re at the ultra low power tip of the proverbial silicon ice berg. The M1 is the first in a series that’ll include more massively multicore versions of the current 11th generation architecture and even more impressive versions with next generation, 12th generation and beyond architecture. Chips like M1X and M2, or whatever Apple ends up calling them.

And unlike Intel, Apple doesn’t provide roadmaps well in advance. They don’t provide them at all. Not beyond extrapolating the power draw on what’s effectively a Bezos graph.

And that leads to a ton of thirst… and a ton of thirst traps. To… trap it. To take advantage of it. To pull those views, subs, and follows. To literally steal attention and reward it… with bullshit.

That includes anonymous twitter accounts that never provide any accurate, original reporting. Like at all. And the various blogs and videos that repeat their fanfic because it not only gives them an excuse to thirst-jack the trap in the first place, but to post a follow-up correcting it whenever anyone with an ounce of sense or integrity points out just how wrong it is and how wrong it was from the start. AKA, the double thirst trap take back combo attack.

And right now, that includes a bevy of fake benchmarks around the M1X, which is expected to be in the new 14-inch and updated 16-inch MacBook Pro, and maybe a higher-end space grey Mac mini and entry-level iMac as well.

Also, straight up clout chasing link-bait on the potential performance of M2, which is expected to be in the next generation MacBook Air and other ultra-low power follow-ups to the debut models.

Now, benchmark leaks aren’t exactly a new or novel thing. Some popular benchmarks apps obliviously or intentionally fail to disclose that, every time you use them, they upload all the results to their own servers and post them all over their public websites. A practice that’s burned many a reviewer ahead of many an embargo. And one that lets people distribute fake benchmarks as real… basically for the lulz.

But, with M1X, there’s really not much in the way of mystery anyway. Apple has been doing X-as-in-Extra versions of their chipsets for almost a decade now, first for the iPad, most recently for the iPad Pro. Basically taken the chip that debuts in the iPhone, adding more performance cores, graphics cores, maybe memory, slapping an X at the end, and calling it a day.

So, it’s not hard to imagine an M1X will be an M1 with extra pCores, gCores, RAM, and Thunderbolt controllers. Maybe Apple will fiddle with the base frequency to goose single core performance, but maybe not even.

Because Apple has said that they’d happily exchange a little frequency, even industry leading performance, for better efficiency as in battery life every day and twice on keynote days. So it’s also likely as not to be the exact same M1 cores, just many, many more of them, for much more massively multicore performance. There could very well be some surprises, but they’ll be in the fine details, not the broad strokes.

Likewise, Apple has been updating their silicon architecture and IP every year, on the year, for more than a decade now. So, just like M1 in the MacBook Air and entry-level MacBook Pro and Mac mini — is based on the same 11th generation technology as the A14 in the iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro, and iPad Air 4, the M2 in the next generation of Macs will almost certainly be based on the next, 12th generation technology that’s also coming in the A15 for the iPhone 13, or iPhone 12s, or whatever Apple ends up calling it. And it’ll have the same kinds of performance, efficiency, and beyond compute unit improvements that we’ve seen over the last few years as well — give or take the occasional leap.

Sure, that’s not as sexy as saying M1X benchmarks leaked or worse, calling it confirmed based on two fake leaks — or two re-blogs of the same leak. But here’s the thing — it’s true.

And even though we live in the decade of super high affinity and zero accountability, trust is still a commodity that’s incredibly hard to earn and just as incredibly easy to spend, and when people are burned by a click, they’re inevitable less likely to click again. So, spend your credibility — and your attention — wisely.

Categories
Uncategorized

Apple wants to protect privacy — Facebook wants to ‘inflict pain’

Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, literally wants to inflict pain on Apple, on Tim Cook. To make them hurt. To lobby the government against them, to claim anti-trust, to do everything they can to paint Apple dirty. Why? Because Apple wants to give us, the customers, the users, the ability to choose whether or not Facebook gets to track us outside their own apps, across other apps, even across the web. Apple considers this simple level of privacy and dignity a fundamental human right. And… Facebook… well, Facebook seems intent on seeing it as an existential threat.

Read the rest in my weekly column at iMore!

https://www.imore.com/apple-wants-protect-privacy-facebook-wants-inflict-pain

Categories
Uncategorized

Wrong About Killing All iPhone Apps!

I love people explaining why you should never, not ever kill all apps on your iPhone. Except, sometimes, that advice sucks, and you totally should. So let me explain and that way it might actually make the kind of sense that does.

Most of the time. Hell, almost all the time, iOS will do a way, way better job at managing apps and multitasking resources on your iPhone than… any puny human.. could ever even dream of doing. Even using on-device intelligence — Machine Learning, algorithms — to predict which apps you’ll most want to open and when. And pre-loading them to make sure they’re primed and ready based on that bet.

Here’s how it works. When you switch out of an app, it’s supposed to save its current state and go to sleep, to hibernate. Then, when you switch back, it’s supposed to wake up, to resume from that exact same state. Right where you left off.

If you don’t go back for a long time though, or if you load up the Camera app, because Apple always wants that to be instantly available with zero shutter lag, and especially if you start taking a ton of computationally intensive photos and videos, but also if you launch a big, cross-compiled game or bloated social media app, one that sucks all the RAM out of the system, iOS will start jetsam… to jettison… the last used, least used apps from memory to make room for those greedy new RAM sucking apps.

Then… then you will have to relaunch any apps that got the boot. Often just exactly those games and social media apps. And it’s annoying. Hella annoying. But it shouldn’t happen too often, especially on more recent iPhones with more RAM.

But, that’s why everyone from Apple Support to Apple’s head of software, engineering, Craig Federighi, will tell you to never, not ever force quit all apps. Any app… unless it’s just completely frozen and non-responsive… Basically non… usable.

Because letting apps sleep and wake is just way, way more power efficient than killing and resurrecting any of them, especially all of them. Both in terms of your time, because you don’t have to go spelunking through the system and the app just to get back to where you left off, and in terms of power, because… iOS doesn’t have deal with all the overhead of you relaunching and spelunking back to where you left off. It’s just better for everyone.

And doing that with all your apps, all the time. Every time. Making it rain apps. Well, that’s not better for anyone. And doing that actually contributes to your battery drain.

So, then, why will Apple Geniuses, on occasion, famously, infamously, sometimes… just sometimes kill all apps anyway? Even tell you to do it? Even though it’s hugely controversial?

Because sometimes an app goes bad, a process goes rogue, your iPhone gets hot, your battery drains before your eyes, and rather than taking the time and going through all the effort of tracking down exactly which app is causing the problem — installing diagnostics, running tests, monitoring for days or weeks — they’ll just… kill everything. And sometimes salt the ground with a hard reset right after.

Volume up. Volume down. Press and hold the side button until you get logo. The… Konami code of trouble shooting.

And yes, sure, sometimes there are known offenders. Over the years those have included Skype, Facebook, Snapchat, Pokemon Go, Instagram. Every beta, seriously Instagram?

The more bloated, the more cross-complied, the more poorly coded, the game or social app, the higher the odds of them behaving poorly. Who could possibly have guessed?

But you can also always start by checking your Settings > Battery > Background usage, look for apps with high background usage, low foreground usage. Force quit those first. Only those. And see if that works. Only when you’re really really desperate, when you really, really can’t figure it out but you need to stop the drain and immediately, that you should even consider scorching the earth with a kill-all.

That’s why the fast app switcher lets you kill apps to begin with. But also why it doesn’t make it easy for you to kill all apps, at least not without making it rain killed apps.

It’s there for when things go wrong, really wrong, so you can fix them with a good old fashioned restart. Not all the time, not with wanton abandon, but only when you really have to. Otherwise, if you just force quit apps all willy nilly like, when you’re looking for the cause of poor performance and excessive battery drain on your iPhone, well…. that cause would be you.

Categories
Uncategorized

iPhone 13 — Always-On Promotion, Portrait Video, More!

Better textured glass finish, ProMotion for both high-refresh rate and always on display, even mag-I-er… MagSafe, full-on Astrophotography, better ultra-wide camera, and, yes, oh yes, Portrait Mode Video with dynamic bokeh. That’s what the iPhone 13 Pro — or more likely iPhone 12s Pro — will be getting this fall, at least according to Max Weinbach and Everything Apple Pro, and if all that sounds too good to be true… well, it just might be.

Textured glass

Ok, so, first up, Max is saying the next Pro will have an improved matte glass finish, with Apple tweaking it towards a smoother, grippier, more Pixel-style texture.

And.. maybe, sure. I mean, Apple’s industrial design team is constantly working on new materials and new finishes, anything that’ll improve that premium look and feel. Durability too. The iPhone 12 only has Ceramic Shield on the front, but the ion-exchange glass on the back is still among the best in the industry. At least when it comes to shatter resistance.

I just really, really hope Apple gives that new texture some new friction, because since they went glass for inductive charging, the iPhone has basically been an air hockey puck — with time from even slightly angled surface to floor… measurable in minutes.

And, for me, the best kind of shatter resistance is avoiding impact to begin with. But let me know what you think. Also, after green and blue, what colors you want to see this year.

ProMotion

Next up, ProMotion. That’s Apple’s name for adaptive refresh. In other words, what the iPad Pro’s LCD display can do, idle around 60Hz, boost up to 120Hz for better than buttery smooth scrolling and high-refresh gaming, drop to 48Hz to show Hollywood movies at the proper 24 frames-per-second, and down to 24Hz to save power on more static interfaces and images. Only since iPhone displays are OLED, not LCD, they’ll also mimic what the Apple Watch can do, and that is bottom out even lower, maybe 10Hz, for positively power sipping always-on display.

And this has been rumored before by… pretty much everyone at this point.. because unlike last year when not even Samsung could produce enough LTPO OLED for an iPhone-sized order, especially not to Apple’s spec, which is basically the biggest and most unforgiving order in the business… this year… there should be more than enough supply for the Pro models.

Max also says that he’s hearing the always-on Lock Screen with feature time, battery, and an icon bar for apps that have notifications pending.

Personally, I’d love to see full-on Apple Watch style rich complications, but, yeah, baby-power-saving-steps, right?

MagSafe

Max says MagSafe will be getting stronger with the iPhone 13, which, ok, maybe that’ll help keep the wallet on better for some, but make taking the chargers off more annoying for others. I don’t know. It’d be great if this could be dynamic as well.

But what I really want to see is some — any! — evidence of MagSafe data transfer, either directly like the smart connector has been doing on the iPad Pro for years already, or wirelessly with the U1 ultra wide band and Bluetooth. Because, if previous reports are true, Apple’s working on an iPhone without a Lightning port — with not ports — maybe this year, maybe next, and this would be an important step towards that.

Astrophotography

Next up is astrophotography, which super interesting, given the iPhone 11 launched with a version of that feature over a year ago already. Were it could extend Night Mode to 30 seconds if you stabilized with something like a tripod.

So, this sounds like… just a lot more than that. Like the ability to hold the exposure even longer but also with machine learning specifically tuned to detect, capture, and highlight celestial features like the moon and stars.

My only question is this — will Apple provide better zoom capabilities on the camera system to really take advantage of it?

Unclear.

Better ultra-wide

Max does say there’ll be a better ultra-wide camera on the iPhone 13. Other reports say all the cameras will be better, including the bigger, internally stabilized wide angle that was previously exclusive to the Max model.

But, I mean, a better camera system on the iPhone, each year, every year, is pretty much the safest bet in tech. It’s one of the most important features and so one of the biggest sales and upgrade drivers. So, from telephoto in 2016 to wide angle in 2019 to LiDAR in 2020, Apple keeps skipping and jumping their way to more and more capable setups.

Including a host of computational photography features that extend those capabilities far, far beyond what the optics alone would allow.

Portrait Mode Video

And this year, Max says that’ll include Portrait Mode… for video. That means using the computational photography system, the simulated lens and depth-of-field, the one that does Portrait Mode stills on current iPhones, an applying it to video. With… with the ability to use depth effect adjustments, in other words, change the amount of bokeh any time after you’ve captured the video. From no blur to… blur intensifies.

And, according to Max, also with the dynamic depth effect system that will let us change and adjust the bokeh after the fact.

Which, if true — and it’s still a big, iPhone Pro Max sized if — and if done well — this’ll be my favorite new feature. But also an incredible amount of computational power, because it’s not just one shot, it’s 24 or 30… maybe even 60 shots per second.

So, yeah, bring on that A15 Bionic. Trionic. Whatever it takes.

Categories
Uncategorized

iPad Pro — Buy Now or Wait for A14X iPad Pro?

Eighth GPU core. Wide angle camera. LiDAR Scanner. 6GB of memory on every model. That’s how Apple updated the iPad Pro last year.

I’ve been using it every day since it first came out alongside the Magic Keyboard and I’m going to tell you whether or not you should get it now… or wait for the next-generation version that’s rumored to be coming out something later this year.

Design

The 2020 iPad Pro kept the same design as the 2018 iPad Pro — because that was the biggest redesign in the history of the iPad. Which also means we’re unlikely to get a design anywhere nearly as big anytime soon.

So, if design is high on your list, go ahead and get the current iPad Pro, because the next one just isn’t going to look much different.

Display

Liquid Retina, Apple’s term for the corner-to-rounded-corner LCD display technology first unveiled with the iPhone XR, is what the 2018 iPad Pro used and what the 2020 iPad Pro still uses. And it’s among the best LCD that LCD can be. Just Retina high-density crisp, P3 wide gamut colorful, and up to 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate smooth. But, because it’s LCD, it doesn’t get the deep black, peak brightness, or wide contrast ratio — basically, the high dynamic range — of OLED.

Since Apple’s apparently still not happy with the tradeoffs OLED forces at larger screen sizes, rumor has it the 2021 iPad Pro will go with miniLED instead. That’s a technology that tries to get close to OLED levels for HDR, while also avoiding some OLED problems.

So, if you don’t care about high dynamic range, in other words, watching HDR content like you would on an iPhone or OLED TV, then you can happily get a current generation iPad Pro.

If you really want that high dynamic range, though, if you just insist on HDR all the things, then you’re going to want to wait on the next iPad Pro.

Compute

The 2020 iPad Pro has an Apple A12Z system-on-a-chip. That’s the 2018 iPad Pro’s A12X but with higher binning, so instead of just 7 functional GPU cores, it has 8. But all of those cores, CPU and GPU, are still A12 generation architecture and IP. Just slightly better optimized and with a bit more graphics punch. And while it may not match the single core performance of the A14 in the iPhone 12 or current iPad Air, it’s still a monster when it comes to multicore. And I’ve yet to maxi it out in daily use.

The 2021 iPad Pro, though, is expected to be getting an Apple A14X. That’ll be the A14 like the iPhone 12 and current iPad Air, but with the extra performance and graphics cores, like the A12Z. In other words, pretty much what Apple just shipped as the M1, minus some Mac-specific IP. Which means it’ll be the the absolutely most monstrous multicore iPad ever. Or, at last until the next, next update.

So, if single core performance isn’t the most important thing to you, or good enough is just good enough for now, now, now, get the current A12Z iPad Pro.

But, if you need the absolute fastest multicore iPad ever, or you just want to make sure you get iPadOS updates for absolutely as long as possible, wait on that rumored A14X.

Capacity

The 2018 iPad Pro introduced a 1TB option that also came with 6GB of memory. The 2020 iPad Pro pushed that 6GB of memory across the entire lineup. And…

It’s honestly hard to tell what Apple will do with the 2020 iPad Pro. It could stay exactly the same, or Apple could decide to push it even further with up to 1.5TB or 2TB of storage and up to 8GB of RAM. Because, for pro apps like Photoshop, the more the better, and the top iPad not even having as much RAM as the bottom Mac, even given the difference in memory handling between iOS and macOS… is just weird.

At the lower end, it’s also possible Apple will continue to offer more storage at the same prices, which they’ve done every so often over the last few years.

So, if you don’t need anything more than 1TB and 6GB, then you don’t need anything more than the current iPad Pro.

But, if you really do need more storage and more memory, you can roll the dice by waiting and seeing if Apple decides to deliver more, or just more for your money, with the 2021 model.

Ports

The 2018 iPad Pro was the first iOS-base device to switch from Lightning to USB-C, something the 2020 iPad Air did as well, and… none of the iPhones have done at all, and may never do. It gives the iPads access to more and faster peripherals, almost on par with the Mac.

Almost, because unlike any of the current Macs, the iPad Pro USB-C port is only USB-C, where the Macs also support Thunderbolt 3.

Now, Apple added on-board Thunderbolt controllers to the M1 for the new Macs, and since the A14X would theoretically be very similar to the M1, many of us are holding out hope that the next generation iPad Pro will also get a thunderbolt controller and also support TB3. Nothing exists until Apple officially announces it, though, so right now it remains just that — a hope.

So, if USB-C is all you need, then the current iPad Pro will give you exactly what you need.

But, if you want to hold out and hope along with us for Thunderbolt 3, then you’ll need to wait on the 2021 iPad Pro at the earliest.

Wireless

The 2020 iPad Pro brought Wi-Fi 6, which… is better than Wi-Fi 5. But there are rumors the 2021 might bring Wi-Fi 6E, which adds 6GHz and makes it actually really better.

Likewise, since the iPhone 12 was all about 5G, it’s a super safe bet that the 2021 iPad Pro will go 5G as well. With support for both Frequency Range 1, the low and mid bands, and Frequency Range 2, the high bands, aka mmWave.

So, if you’re fine with Wi-Fi 6 and LTE, you’ll be fine with the current iPad Pro.

But, if you really want Wi-Fi 6E and 5G, you’ll really want to wait on the 2021 ver

Camera

The 2020 iPad Pro received a fairly major camera update, at least as iPad camera updates go. It got a dual camera system for the first time, adding in an ultra-wide angle. And it also got a LiDAR Scanner for near-instant augmented reality tracking. Sadly, the LiDAR Scanner wasn’t hooked into the camera system like it is on the iPhone 12 either then or, double sadly, now.

And… there aren’t any solid rumors about the 2021 iPad Pro being any better. That means we’ll probably see the same kind of incremental camera hardware improvements we always do, and the A14X image signal processor will bring way better computational photography to the table, but it will almost certainly, once again, fall way, way short of what the same generation iPhone is rocking.

So, you’re probably find just getting the current generation iPad Pro when it comes to the camera.

But, if you wait, you will get slightly better optics and at least some of the latest computational camera benefits. Even though I’d love, love to see Apple get just way more aggressive here.

Extras

The 2018 iPad Pro dropped Touch ID for Face ID, which was great at the time but has become less great in the age of masks. Apple’s begun working around this with the Watch, and there are rumors that the next iPhone will bring back Touch ID but in-display. If the iPhone is only getting that this fall, though, odds are the iPad Pro will only get it after that, in the next next update in 2022 or 2023.

Likewise, with so much work from home going on, there’s been a lot of frustration with Apple putting the front-facing camera in portrait mode while we’re all using it so often in landscape. Meaning all anyone ever sees of us is wicked side-eye. But, there haven’t been any credible rumors of Apple changing that… like at all.

So, if you’re waiting for better biometrics or video conferencing optics, you may have a long while still to wait.

And while you’re waiting, check out this playlist, where I run down everything Apple has coming our way next. See you in the video!

Categories
Uncategorized

Apple March 2021 Event Preview!

Yeah, we’re doing this again. 2021: 2020 Reloaded style. Don’t even… You know the drill.

Logo. Speed ramp. Drone shot. Apple Park. Transition. Steady Cam. Rapid zoom. Tim Cook. Good Morning!

And then… what exactly? Apple TV, iPad Pro, iPhone SE Plus, AirTags, AirPods, M1X Macs?

See my weekly column at iMore to find out!

https://www.imore.com/if-apple-has-march-2021-event-heres-what-id-love-see

Categories
Uncategorized

Face ID — Apple’s iOS 14.5 Fix Fully Explained!

You’re out and about in this… zombie apocalypse, just trying to live your life, you go to unlock your iPhone, but because you’re wearing a mask, Face ID just drops you straight into Passcode, and you’re left frustrated, annoyed, trying to poke out those digits… like an animal. While the world burns.

And no, Apple can’t run to your house and weld Touch ID back on. And that doesn’t even work if you’re wearing gloves anyway. And maybe the next iPhone will address all this, maybe not, but you need some help with this iPhone and you need it now. Now. Now.

Apple has a plan. Is it a good plan? That’s what we’re here to figure out. But it starts with the Apple Watch and iOS 14.5, currently in beta. If you have it — or when you get it — jump into Settings > Face ID & Passcode. Authenticate, go down to Unlock with Apple Watch, and switch it on.

Now, what happens behind the scenes… is a lot. Because, your iPhone has been able to unlock your Apple Watch since the original Apple Watch launched way back in 2015. So, letting your Apple Watch also unlock your iPhone is… complicated. Like a door with keys on both sides. And Apple wants to avoid any possible security issues, exploits or, you know, universe ending space time paradoxes.

That’s why it’s being handled in a very specific, hyper narrow, highly focused context. And that’s unlocking your iPhone and only unlocking your iPhone. Not Apple Pay, because you can already do that directly with your Apple Watch. And not iTunes or App Store purchases, or iCloud Keychain, at least not for now. Just iPhone unlock. Only iPhone unlock. Here’s how it works.

You start off by using Face ID exactly as you normally would. Just… look at your iPhone. But, if you’re wearing a mask and Face ID can’t “see” your nose and mouth — in other words, can’t scan enough of your facial geometry to reliably identify you — instead of immediately failing and demanding you enter your Passcode, the way it did before, it’ll now kick over to your Apple Watch to confirm your identity.

For that to work, obviously, you need an Apple Watch. And a recent one. Series 3 or later, because it also needs to be able to run the latest version of watchOS in order for all this to work. And if that bothers you, if that’s a deal breaker for you, let me know in the comments.

That Apple Watch needs to be paired with the iPhone you’re using and on your wrist with Wrist Detection enabled — which it is the default… but just in case you’ve turned it off at some point. That’s the system that uses the heart rate sensors to keep your Apple Watch unlocked while you’re wearing it but also to lock it immediately when it comes off.

That’s to stop someone else from trying to use your Apple Watch to unlock your phone, but more on that in a minute.

So, you have to be wearing your Apple Watch and it has to have been unlocked, either via your iPhone or because you entered the Watch passcode earlier. Because, if your Watch doesn’t know you’re you, it can’t vouch that you’re you to your iPhone.

Similarly, you have to have used Face ID or your Passcode to successfully unlock your iPhone at least once, recently, as well. That makes sure Face ID is active and ready to rock.

And while this all may sound super-involved, it’s really just to make sure everything is all nice and securely authenticated before enabling this added, extra level of convenience. And, really, all of us are doing all of this every day pretty much all the time now anyway, automatically. I’m just going over all the little details because it’s what I do, and if you’re here for it, do me a solid and hit that subscribe button and bell and help this community grow.

Now, when you want to unlock, your Apple Watch and iPhone have to be in close proximity — Ideally, you’re the one wearing your Watch and trying to unlock your iPhone. But since it’s still in beta, we’ll have to wait and see what the exact range ends up being. Not that most of us are in the habit of leaving our iPhones lying around, unattended, where they might get pilfered anyway.

I’ll get to situations like if you’re sleeping in a second, but… if you’re worried about someone else picking up your iPhone and trying to unlock it using your Apple Watch, the way older, cruder Bluetooth Trusted Object systems worked, well, they’d first have to be wearing a mask to avoid Face ID just falling back to Passcode immediately.

Even then, to prevent pranks or shenanigans, whenever your iPhone unlocks via the Apple Watch, you get a Taptic notification right on your wrist, and a button that immediately lets you re-lock your iPhone if wasn’t you and someone else was trying to get in without your permission. Also, if your iPhone is moved out of Bluetooth range of your Apple Watch within one minute of your iPhone being unlocked by your Apple Watch, your iPhone will re-lock automatically. Just in case.

And if you are worried about a snoopy roommate trying to use your Apple Watch to unlock your iPhone while you’re sleeping, well, the whole unlock with Apple Watch system is automatically disabled if your Apple Watch is in Bedtime mode. And even if it’s not, if your Watch hasn’t detected any movement in the last little while and isn’t reasonably sure you’re awake… or conscious, it’s going to decline to authenticate as well. Again, just in case.

Like I said, this isn’t some crude bluetooth trusted object system. Convenience is absolutely still being balanced against security. There’s just a ton of work going on behind the scenes to make sure that, when you’re out and about with your mask on, and need to use your iPhone, you can just lift it up, look at it — and even with your mask still on — your Apple Watch will authenticate you and unlock your iPhone so you can use it just exactly when you need to.

Now, I do hope that Apple tightens up the range before release. It’s currently about 2 meters and that feels just too broad for me in the context of using my watch to unlock my phone, which should both be in my possession at the time, meaning only a meter or so at most. I’m assuming Apple is using time of flight, like they do for the Apple Watch to Mac unlock, to prevent relay and replay attacks, so it’s possible they can find a sweet spot where your iPhone will never be out of watch range but also unlikely to be out of reach where someone else can nab it.

Ultimately, though, those of you who’ve been here with me for a while know where I’m going to go with this — we need to move from single, reactive authentication to multiple, active authentication. In other words, instead of having to Touch ID, Face ID, or Passcode into our devices every time, like an animal, the devices should be constantly checking every touch of our finger, glance of our face, snippet of our voice, along with gait analysis and trusted objects like an Apple Watch, combined with time, place, and behavior data, and just maintain a trust threshold. If they’re certain we… are us, they should just be unlocked and ready to use. And when they’re not, that when they should challenge for a full scan of our finger or face or passcode.

Rumors of Touch ID returning alongside Face ID in the iPhone 13, and things like Apple Watch unlock make it feel like we’re getting there… just not anywhere near quickly enough.

Categories
Uncategorized

M1 MacBook Pro — Buy Now or Wait for M1X?

The M1 MacBook Pro. Currently the most powerful portable Apple Silicon, with not only performance but battery life that just clowns the same, low-power Intel version from the same year. But, also… stuck with the exact same design.

It’s really more of a MacBook Air Pro, and I’ve been reviewing it since it first came out, so I’m here to tell you whether you should get it now, or wait for the MacBook Pro Pro versions that are coming up next.

Design

The M1 MacBook Pro that Apple released late last year is the entry-level MacBook Pro, and I don’t just mean by price-point, but also literally the entry-level MacBook Pro. Apple opened it up, ripped out the intel, slammed in the M1, closed it up, and called it a day. At least when it comes to the design. Which is totally fine as new silicon launch platforms go, because it keeps everything else nice and stable and lets everyone focus on launching that new silicon. And since it’s barely any bigger than a MacBook Air, and still paradoxically thinner at its thickest point, it remains the best design for anyone who wants maximum performance from an ultra portable. At least for now.

Because what’s rumored to be coming next is that long-anticipated redesign. Specifically, something that keeps the flat corners but also flattens out the currently curvy top and bottom. What that’ll mean in terms of external ergonomics and internal capacity, we’ll have to wait and see.

So, if you don’t care about the design, and the current bead-blasted aluminum unibody is perfectly fine for you, go ahead and get the M1 MacBook Pro now.

But, if you’ve just been aching for that redesign, and you want your MacBook Pro to look even more like an iPad Pro… taco? Then go ahead and wait on the M1X version rumored for later this year.

Display

The M1 MacBook Pro kept the same 13.4-inch Retina high-density, P2 wide-gamut, LCD display as the previous generation Intel models. No better, but only because it was already one of the very best LCD laptop displays in the business. It’s just a little tight if you’re trying to do a lot of audio, video, or code editing strictly on the built-in display.

The M1X MacBook Pro, though, is rumored to be getting an even bigger, better, bezel-blasting display. Closer to 14-inches, and possibly even miniLED, which uses local dimming zones for deeper blacks, bright whites, better contrast, and closer to full-on high-dynamic range, or HDR. Maybe not as dynamic as OLED, but also not as problematic. Also, for those who want more of a portable workstation, a 16-inch M1X should be coming around the same time.

So, if the current LCD display is good enough for you, get the current M1 MacBook Pro.

But, if you really want something a little bigger and with a higher dynamic range so you can really get your HDR on, wait for the 14-inch M1X. Maybe even and especially the 16-inch version.

Compute

The M1 MacBook Pro is Apple’s first generation of Apple silicon, based on the same IP and architecture as the A14 Bionic in the iPhone 12. It’s an ultra-low-power system on a chip, but it’s got just about the best single-core performance in the business. Especially with the active cooling system that lets it run, full out, for far longer than the Air. Also, it’s not just fast it’s responsive. So much so, it makes using the Mac feel like using the iPad. Just… Instant. It runs native apps better than ever before and slugabed intel apps — especially the ones that lean hard on graphics — surprisingly well. The up to 20 hours of battery life are beyond mind blowing. It really makes the Pro the M1 Mac to beat right now.

But, it’s the ultra-lower power version and that means, yes, there will also be a higher-power option. An M1X, or whatever Apple ends up calling the chipset that adds even more performance and graphics cores for even better multicore performance. Maybe even lets the single core run just a little bit faster as well. How many more cores remains an open question, but rumors are pointing to anywhere from 12 to 16, so 1 and a half to double. Either of which is really going to shake things up.

So, if you want the best mobile processor on the market right now, and you want it right now, now, now, get the M1 MacBook Pro.

But, if you want even more multicore to throw at your problems, then you’ll want to wait on the M1X MacBook Pro.

Capacity

One of the best parts of the M1 MacBook Pro is the unified memory. Just a big pool of 8GB or 16GB slapped right on the chipset and shared between the CPU, GPU, neural engine, and image signal processor. Combined with everything from memory compression to ultra-fast swap — I mean 8GB is still 8GB, but it’s the very best 8GB it can be. Same for 16GB. Especially when it comes to graphics, because embedded graphics is usually far, far more RAM constrained. And bottlenecked. But those are the only options on the entry level Pro, both the old Intel and the new M1… 8GB or 16GB.

But, an M1X MacBook Pro will almost certainly take a page from the higher-end Intel MacBook Pro and go all the way up to 32GB on the 14-inch, 64GB on the 16-inch. At least to start.

Same with the storage capacity. Instead of being capped at 2TB, they should mirror the Intel models and go to 4TB and 8TB respectively. Which. Just. Drool.

So, if you don’t think you’ll need more than 16GB and 2TB for your MacBook Pro, go ahead and get the M1 now.

But, if you really want more, especially if you want much, much more, you’ll want to wait on the M1X.

Ports

One of the biggest compromises on the entry-level MacBook Pro, since Apple introduced it back in 2016, is that it only has two USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 ports, and they’re both on your left. Which makes it more than slightly annoying if the only power plug in range is decidedly on your right. It made the lack of MagSafe, on this model in particular, particularly hard to swallow. And the M1 version did nothing at all to address this.

Simply by virtual of being the higher-end MacBook Pro, though, the M1X version should have four ports, two on each side. Rumor has it, though, that it’ll also bring back both MagSafe for power and an SD Card slot for media, something else that went missing back in 2016. Especially if those are in addition to, and not instead of any of the USB-C ports, that’ll make the next MacBooks even more Pro. Again.

So, if two times USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 is all you need, then go ahead and get the M1 MacBook Pro now.

But, if you’re willing to wait, four ports, maybe even MagSafe and SD, could be yours on the M1X.

Pricing

The entry-level, 2-port M1 MacBook Pro starts at $1299, which really fits in with it’s more portable, quasi-MacBook Air Pro origins. The current higher-end, 4 port, 13-inch MacBook Pro starts at $1799, and the 16-inch, at $2399.

Apple could hold the line on those prices for the M1X 14-inch and 16-inch MacBooks Pro respectively, or they could bump them up slightly to pay down whatever new technologies, like miniLED they end up including. We’ll just have to wait and see.

But, if money matters and you want an entry level MacBook Pro, you’ll want the M1, available now.

And if money — and time — are no object and you’re just lusting after a higher-end Pro, you’ll want to wait on the M1X Pro.

And while you’re waiting, check out this playlist, where I preview all the Macs that are coming next. Just click on the playlist and I’ll see you next video.